Less is more – Powershifter Shifts to Mini Cards

With a new Yaletown agency address came the requirement for new business cards. So when I was cleaning out my office drawer I found an old box of Moo Mini Cards that I used personally. I thought that these could be the solution I was looking for. The response when I handed the little cards out personally was always the same. That of wonderment and affection. Those are emotions that I would love to have associated with the brand. They are also very Web 2.0 like us and as new employees come into the fold we could order them up easy peasy. That said they are so cost effective that even contractors could get a set. Couple that with the cool key chain case and it was a no brainer.

So with that I present to you the new POWERSHiFTER mini cards. [Cool black case sold separately].

Do metrics really kill creativity?

In an Adage article by Patrick Sarkissian, he makes the claim that metrics are indeed killing creativity. His point is really about using metrics to make creative decisions exclusively. Metrics have always been in advertising and I suspect have driven the decisions of many clients that are too afraid to take risks in general. Metrics and measurement are always important, but so is the ability to take a chance with a creative campaign that may not have all the numbers and metrics to back it up. ROI and reduced risk for business is always an important thing to consider for campaigns, but so is taking a risk. Not taking risks will get you slow and steady returns with little ,to no loss there is no question. Risks can pay off huge when the creative resonates with the audience and in the end makes for a remarkable campaign that elevates your brand or product to new levels.
Measurement is essential but the human spirit quite often surprises. During the Olympics crowds of hundreds, and sometimes thousands, would spontaneously breakout into the national anthem when they were finished quite often the crowd would do it all over again. I noticed that the anthem was notably missing from most ad campaigns during the Olympics. I am not sure if it was metrics or not but if there had been an anthematic ad campaign it would have resonated without a doubt. My point is that humans are not always predictable and great creativity connects in ways that metrics cannot always predict.
Metrics are important sure, but should they drive all creative choices for your campaign? Sure if slow steady returns are what you are looking for. If you want the potential of a “knock it out of the park” campaign you are going to have to take some “calculated” risks to make that happen.

Some recent Canadian Facebook statistics

Last month I had the pleasure of sitting on a “Social Media for Business” panel discussion with Louise Clements, the Director of Sales for Facebook Canada. She shared with me some of the latest data on Canadian Facebook users that I would like to pass on. The most staggering figure that I was presented with was that “16 million Canadians spend no less than 1 hour a day on Facebook”. Wow Canada has a population 33,212,696~ [stats Canada July 2008]. That’s an amazing 48.48% of Canadians in total. This is why they have been working on making fan pages more useful to business and brands. With that level of Canadians engaged daily on Facebook having a fanpage for your brand is more important than ever.
I am just going to post the statistics and will provide some analysis later this week.
13-17 year olds
  • 54% Female
  • 46% Male
  • Each has an average of 220 friends
  • They make up 12% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 80% of all online 12 – 17 year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 77% use it more than email
  • 44% use it more than cell phones
  • 40% use it more than any other communication tool
13-17 year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 57% add/use an application
  • 41% become a fan of a page
  • 62% upload/view/share a photo
  • 39% RSVP to an event
  • 47% share/post/watch a video
  • 58% read their news feed
  • 13% send a gift [that surprised me!]
18-24 year olds
  • 48% Female
  • 52% Male
  • Each has an average of 247 friends
  • They make up 29% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 93.8% of all online 18 – 24 year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 82% use it more than email
  • 43% use it more than cell phones
  • 45% use it more than any other communication tool
18-24 year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 52% add/use an application
  • 33% become a fan of a page
  • 63% upload/view/share a photo
  • 56% RSVP to an event
  • 47%share/post/watch a video
  • 67% read their news feed
  • 20% send a gift
25-34 year olds
  • 53% Female
  • 47% Male
  • Each has an average of 153 friends
  • They make up 32% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 27% of all online 25 – 34 year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 79% use it more than email
  • 49% use it more than cell phones
  • 44% use it more than any other communication tool
25-34 year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 50% add/use an application
  • 31% become a fan of a page
  • 59% upload/view/share a photo
  • 34% RSVP to an event
  • 44% share/post/watch a video
  • 63% read their news feed
  • 19% send a gift
35-44 year olds
  • 56% Female
  • 44% Male
  • Each has an average of 85 friends
  • 67% are parents
  • They make up 16% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 78.2% of all online 35-44 year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 58% use it more than email
  • 56% use it more than cell phones
  • 47% use it more than any other communication tool
35-44 year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 62% add/use an application
  • 30% become a fan of a page
  • 60% upload/view/share a photo
  • 37% RSVP to an event
  • 43% share/post/watch a video
  • 62% read their news feed
  • 26% send a gift
45-54 year olds
  • 62% Female
  • 38% Male
  • Each has an average of 49 friends
  • 75% are parents
  • They make up 9% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 74.8% of all online 45-54 year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 65% use it more than email
  • 60% use it more than cell phones
  • 49% use it more than any other communication tool
45-54 year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 55% add/use an application
  • 28% become a fan of a page
  • 64% upload/view/share a photo
  • 29% RSVP to an event
  • 50% share/post/watch a video
  • 58% read their news feed
  • 31% send a gift
55+ year olds
  • 59% Female
  • 41% Male
  • Each has an average of 51 friends
  • 81% are parents
  • They make up 6% of the Facebook population.
  • They represent 61% of all online 55+ year olds†
How are they using Facebook?
  • 60% use it more than email
  • 69% use it more than cell phones
  • 40% use it more than any other communication tool
55+ year old Facebook behavior (in the past week):
  • 51% add/use an application
  • 25% become a fan of a page
  • 51% upload/view/share a photo
  • 30% RSVP to an event
  • 46% share/post/watch a video
  • 51% read their news feed
  • 30% send a gift
† Statistics are  from Comscore July 2009

Social Media, Search & Viral Now Outperform Banner Ads for Traffic

In a recent Adage article, using data from the research firm Hitwise, t was reported that Facebook now accounts for more referral traffic to some sites than Google. Facebook now has a confirmed number of registered users in the range of 200 million. Social networking has grown a whopping 93 percent since 2006; the amount of time people spend communicating online has increased from 18 to 32 percent of their total online time.[1] The actions performed in Facebook are shifting as well; users spend a good portion of their time on the newly redesigned newsfeed page, where they can quickly scan for status updates and user-recommended videos, products, and  articles. Similar streams in Twitter and FriendFeed are also becoming powerful recommendation engines. Further, the low click-through rate of banners on social media sites is even further below the already shockingly low industry average of .01%-.02%. These low results are primarily due to the highly focused activity performed by users on social media sites, and also explain why media placement companies have bluntly told me, “Social media does not work for online advertising.”

The numbers:

  • Last fall, it was reported that 40 hours a month are spent online by the average internet user in North America.[2]
  • Of those online, 75% are spending time in the social networking and social media space.[3]
  • The the industry attributes a .1%-.2% click though rate on most web banners and that number drops further on social networking activity.
  • Social networking has grown 93% since 2006.[1]

Now, let’s look at some of my anecdotal social media link click-through activity. According to mrtweet.com, a Twitter user recommendation site, I post an average of 42 tweets a day. 28 percent of my posts contain links; that’s about 12 links per day. I use Hootsuite to post links, as it enables me to measure the stats of those who actually click on the Hootsuite to post links, as it enables me to measure the stats of those who actually click on the links I post. Last week, I had a total of 1250 clicks[pretty graphs], either directly or through re-tweets[4], on 84 links. That gives me an average click-through rate of 7%. I have approximately 1200 followers, and there are hundreds of thousands of Twitter users with substantially more followers than me. With the growing number of Twitter users alone, recent rumours of the company’s acquisition by Google make sense. I post about half the number of links on Facebook as I do on Twitter, but can’t measure the click-throughs as Facebook currently lacks the requisite analytical tools. The total number of online social media users across the various platforms-Facebook, Twitter, Stumbleupon, Del.icio.us., etc.-provide a clear indication of where consumers spend their time, and why it’s important for companies and agencies to create content and campaigns that are viral-worthy.

So where does that leave the web banner? Should we abandon the staple that has given hope to so many web start-ups and sustained others? The answer is no; the web banner has its place in delivering brand presence and campaign messaging online. Perhaps if the web advertising industry had not hung its collective hat on CTR, this issue may not have seen so much back-peddling as there is today. The industry was so keen on proving its relevance in the web’s early days that it differentiated itself from other mediums through the highly measurable CTR. Unfortunately, what wasn’t considered were the lack of novelty and typically bad experiences users often associated with the click.

However, banners are still important in that we can track their impacts by measuring all customer impressions through comprehensive analytic tools. I believe it is all part of the mix, but the final destination of any campaign must be relevant and engaging enough to hold the attention of users, and contain content that will compel them to share it with others. Creative agencies play an important role in orchestrating compelling ad campaigns that customers can relate to, but ultimately, the method of directing viewers to those destinations is shifting from the once almighty banner ad, to the terrain of “the people’s media.”

[1] This, according to a survey conducted by Netpop, based on the 105 million U.S. broadband users.
[2] Comscore
[3] PEW Internet research, March 2009
[4] A re-tweet is when a Twitter user likes your post so much and recommends the link to their followers through the method of  what is called re-tweeting.

Tiny URL services are killing your brand in Twitter

I was sent a link today for a product that I thought at first glance was a joke. I was fooled last week by an elaborate hoax site on a fictional smart phone that was actually a tourism ad for Nova Scotia. So forgive me if I was a bit reluctant to bite on this one. The product is called Go-Girl and after careful examination of the site I determined that it was a real product and that I would put it out there in the twittersphere and ask the question: “Ok so I am not sure whr 2 go w/ this so I am just putting it out there. I had no idea there was a demand 4 this? http://www.go-girl.com/. Now normally I would have either pasted the URL in the TweetDeck URL shortening field or posted the site via The Hootsuite javascript button in my Safari Bar and it would have looked like http://tinyurl.com/btp55y. This is pretty much the norm for a lot of links in tweets so that users can add as much context to the posted link as possible [remember 140 characters maximum]. Now because I did not do that, the URL went into the Twitter stream as is and un-compromised. Sending in the raw URL meant that if the fine marketing folks at Go Girl had a Twitter alert service activated and actively searching for the branded url they would be notified of the comment. They then could asses the comment and take action. Well the do and did just that. Within minutes I received the following: “Go_Girls: @jaypiddy you better believe it! The women have spoken! Over 40,000 visitors to our website yesterday! It almost crashed! xx” So they were able to talk about the brand and maybe change my mind on it.

I call this Twitter Search Engine Optimization and it will become more and more important as the Twitter base grows in the coming years. In fact the real time search functionality twitter is so powerful that I suspect that Google is trying to figure out how much the acquisition is going to cost and whether or not they have more in their war chest of cash to fend off Microsoft in the in the deal. But the Twitter Search Engine Optimization of your branded URL only works if clean un-shortened URL or your brand is mentioned by name in the tweet stream. Quite often tweets only include the URL and not your brand name in order to save the precious characters for the tweet comment.

Now if I had posted this from a tiny URL service like this “Ok so I am not sure whr 2 go w/ this so I am just putting it out there. I had no idea there was a demand 4 this? http://tinyurl.com/btp55y” there would have been no response from the company. My post and the subsequent conversations with others would have gone completely un-noticed by the Go Girl team that was monitoring the conversation on Twitter.

Companies and brands will need to figure out ways that their brands and branded URLs get into the Twitterstream the same way that they are concerned about key words getting picked up by search engine crawlers if they are to take full advantage of Twitters search capabilities.

I have one idea but would like to open the floor on the topic and see how others feel about the situation. The idea that I have for companies is to place their own “Tweet this” buttons in stories and articles, like Digg and Share this etc, that would invoke their own branded tiny URL service so that the Twitterstream would receive a shortened yet TSEO link back to the original content. Sony would have http://sony.com/A34f and I would have http://powershiftermedia.com/34E etc. I am not totally sure how it would work but I know that through javascript and an API key there would be a simple way to create this for your site.

The floor is now open. What are your thoughts on this and who will step up and create this application if it’s needed. If ya make a million or two off of the deal then you can buy me lunch.

Lot’s of shoppers but where’s the loot?

On Saturday we decided to take a trip up to the Apple Store and spend some of the birthday cash that I had received a few days earlier. We live in the West End of the city and decided that a walk up Robson street to the Apple store and get us into the Christmas spirit by immersing ourselves in the sessional throng of holiday shoppers. Well the downtown crowds did not disappoint and it was pretty intense and actually quite difficult to make our way through the busy sidewalks. I thought to myself that maybe Canada is going to be immune from the US recession after all. At least that’s what it looked like at first glance. Then I noticed something strange in the sea of Christmas shoppers. There were little to no shopping bags being toted about. I thought maybe it was just a fluke and this would surely change as we made our way into the centre of the shopping district. My count put it at 1 in 10 with a bag and not a big bag at that. Five, ten, then fifteen minutes went by and nothing changed with my count. This was a stunning observation for this time of year.

So what is going on here? Are people waiting for bargains? Are they just out and about window shopping? Or are they shopping online? It’s not like there are no bargains to be had. The B2 shoe store had price cuts upwards of 60% off just about all of the stock.

If this trend continues my feeling is the retailers are going to be decimated this season.

What are you doing this Christmas? Are you cutting back? Buying online? Waiting until there are better bargains?